ARCHIVE

Royalty payments questioned as exports surge

THE US Senate committee on energy and natural resources has asked federal regulators to look into...

Justin Niessner

Incoming committee chairman Ron Wyden and ranking Republican Lisa Murkowski said out-of-date regulations could be allowing miners to sell coal overseas at higher prices than reflected in their royalty payments.

In a letter addressed to Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar, the lawmakers said alarming media reports suggested taxpayers could lose tens of millions of dollars in annual royalty revenue – particularly as US coal exports hit record levels.

“As companies seek to ship more coal overseas, taxpayers must be confident that the Bureau of Land Management and the Office of Natural Resources Revenue have stringent royalty collection and auditing controls in place as coal markets become increasingly oriented toward international buyers,” the senators wrote.

US coal exports this year are estimated to reach 124 million tons.

“Coal companies need to be paying taxpayers all of the money they are owed,” Wyden said.

“Federal agencies have a duty to ensure state and federal taxpayers get the full value for natural resources extracted from public lands. If regulators, or decades-old laws, are not doing enough to protect the public interest, our committee intends to find out, and to fix it.”

Between the 2001 and 2011 fiscal years, coal royalty revenue for the federal government and Indian tribes has more than doubled to $898 million, according to ONRR. It accounts for 21% of federal onshore royalty payments, 13% of tribal royalty payments and 8% of total federal royalty collections.

The domestic price of coal mined in the Powder River Basin is roughly $13 per ton, according to press reports, which is less than half of international prices that are $30 a ton or more. That price difference would translate to a royalty shortfall to the federal government of more than $2 per ton.

Although state officials agree there is no evidence that companies have failed to pay proper royalties, government auditing of sales over the past few years has begun.

Last month, Reuters reported that coal companies were avoiding $100 million in royalty payments by selling coal through “shell companies” before exporting it.

By valuing coal at a low domestic price then selling it at a higher rate to international customers, miners were alleged to have booked big profits through skirting royalty payment rules.

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence: Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024

Exclusive research for Mining Magazine Intelligence Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024 shows mining companies are embracing cutting-edge tech

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Future Fleets Report 2024

The report paints a picture of the equipment landscape and includes detailed profiles of mines that are employing these fleets