MARKETS

Dueling protests over Massey facility peaceful

AS a permit submitted by Massey Energy for a new coal silo at its Goals Coal facility remains in ...

Donna Schmidt

About 50 activists opposed to the energy company and its practices marched past the facility, while more than two dozen Massey supporters waved signs of support for the company and the coal industry in general outside the entrance to Marsh Fork Elementary School. The Goals Coal facility stands about 80m from the primary school.

Activists, there to continue demanding the company tear down the one existing silo near the school, chanted, “tear it down, it’s illegal; tear it down, save our kids”. Coal River Mountain Watch, one of the groups present, actively protests against mountaintop coal removal and has targeted Massey heavily in recent months.

Massey supporters, meanwhile, held their ground in front of March Fork. “My husband works for Massey,” one woman’s sign read. “My child goes to this school. We’re OK with it.”

The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is still investigating the permits for the existing silo and the now-suspended permit for the proposed new one. State and federal law mandates no new mining operations are permitted within 100m of a school

In 2003 and again in June 2005, the department approved the silo permits anyway, saying the silos were exempt from the 100m-limit because they were within the permit boundary of an operation that existed prior to the August 1977 passing of the Mining Control and Reclamation Act, the federal act that includes the 100m rule.

Questions still remain on the accuracy of the maps submitted on behalf of Massey when it submitted both permits.

“We found a problem and we fixed it. Period,” commented DEP secretary Stephanie Timmermeyer. “We are acting swiftly to remedy the problem with the maps.”

Timmermeyer said the department was still waiting on the results of a site survey it hoped would determine the silo’s location as well as the original permit boundary.

“We must rely on the maps submitted to our agency by licensed professional engineers, who, by law, certify that the maps submitted as part of a permit application are true and accurate,” she said in a statement. “We need to make sure we hold companies and consultants to a high standard of accuracy and we have checks and balances in place to ensure the information we use to make permit decisions is the best available.”

Conservationists have called on Timmermeyer to resign over her department’s bungling.

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Future Fleets Report 2024

The report paints a picture of the equipment landscape and includes detailed profiles of mines that are employing these fleets

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Digitalisation Report 2023

An in-depth review of operations that use digitalisation technology to drive improvements across all areas of mining production