MARKETS

Fraccing evils overstated: Yale

RESEARCHERS from Yale University in the US have concluded that fraccing may not deserve its reput...

Haydn Black

The Yale research appears to confirm an earlier report from the US Environmental Protection Agency that widespread fraccing may not deserve its poor public image.

After analysing samples of groundwater collected from private residences in north-eastern Pennsylvania, host to the Marcellus and Utica shales, the researchers determined that groundwater contamination was more closely related to surface toxins seeping down into the water table than pollutants from fraccing operations seeping upwards.

“The dominant source of organic compounds to shallow aquifers was consistent with surface spills of disclosed chemical additives,” they wrote.

“[There is] no evidence of association with deeper brines or long-range migration of these compounds to the shallow aquifers.

“Organic compounds found in drinking water aquifers above the Marcellus Shale and other shale plays could reflect natural geologic transport processes or contamination from anthropogenic activities, including enhanced natural gas production,” the Yale researchers said.

They suggested that drinking water sources affected by disclosed surface spills could be targeted for treatment and monitoring to protect public health.

It is unclear whether chemicals injected into deep shale horizons reach shallow groundwater aquifers and affect local water quality, they found.

Their findings from the largest study of its kind, sampled a mere 64 private water wells near fraccing sites to determine if they could be contaminated by drilling fluids.

The Yale study seems to partially support a Cornell University study which suggested frac fluid causes the release of particles in soil that bind to pollutants, which have the potential to contaminate groundwater.

The flowback fluid causes associated pollutants, such as heavy metals, to leach out of the soil and into groundwater.

Scientists at the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences believe the frac fluid's chemical composition weakens the bind between tiny particles called colloids and the soil. This makes groundwater susceptible to contamination when these particles leach out of the soil, bringing bound pollutants and heavy metals with it.

The Yale results were recently published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, and found those chemicals assessed likely not a threat to human health

They also found that there was a correlation between the concentration of toxins and the nearest gas well that has had an environmental health and safety violation reported.

Researchers also noted that shale underlying the Pennsylvania surface did not cause any organic chemicals to seep into groundwater aquifers.

However, these findings may not be applicable to all locations worldwide.

The researchers also said it was too early to declare that fraccing was completely safe without more investigation.

Earlier the US EPA found there was no evidence that fraccing has led to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States.

The Yale report follows research from Duke University, published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology Letters which found that fraccing accounted for less than 1% of water used nationwide for industrial purposes.

This suggested that the natural gas extraction processes are far less water-intensive than previously thought.

Duke researchers evaluated the overall water footprint of hydraulic fracturing of unconventional shale gas and oil throughout the US, finding that between 2005 and 2014, unconventional shale gas and oil extraction used 708 billion litres and 232BL of water, respectively.

Integrated data from 6-10 years of operation yielded 803BL of combined flowback and produced water from unconventional shale gas and oil formations.

While the hydraulic fracturing revolution has increased water use and wastewater production in the United States, its water use and produced water intensity is lower than other energy extraction methods and represents only a fraction of total industrial water use nationwide, Duke found.

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence: Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024

Exclusive research for Mining Magazine Intelligence Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024 shows mining companies are embracing cutting-edge tech

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Future Fleets Report 2024

The report paints a picture of the equipment landscape and includes detailed profiles of mines that are employing these fleets