MARKETS

Public engagement clears path for science

A STUMBLING block that lies in the path of successful carbon storage technologies may not in fact...

Angie Tomlinson
Public engagement clears path for science

Nicholls said although carbon storage could contribute to a reduction in greenhouse gases while still meeting the world’s growing energy demands, not everyone believed carbon storage was a viable or desirable pathway for the future.

“History provides many examples of failed or delayed projects where good science has not been publicly acceptable,” Nicholls said.

“Before embarking on an engagement program it is important to understand the context from which people may be forming opinions about carbon storage.”

Nicholls outlined four lessons that could be applied to the engagement process. Early engagement was critical to the success of a project; engagement must be targeted to all those with an opinion; an effective engagement program requires different skills to the technical skills of a project team; and engagement requires planning as detailed as the technical project plan and it must be integrated in the planning process from the beginning.

“It is hard for those of us trained in science to cope with the feelings and perceptions of people who do not trust the science.”

A significant number of carbon storage projects have already been started or are being considered. However, at least three carbon storage demonstration projects have been delayed or cancelled due to public pressure.

“Two of these, one in Hawaii and the other in Norway, proposed to trial ocean disposal of CO2 rather the geosequestration. The Hawaii demonstration was defeated primarily on local grounds, whereas opposition in Norway came from the larger international environmental lobby groups,” she said.

These two trials were eventually scaled down.

The Australian coal industry has adopted a planned engagement process in the COAL21 initiative, aimed at developing a national approach to eliminating greenhouse gas emissions.

The initiative has adopted a multi-stakeholder approach with a steering committee. Another step in the program will be a stakeholder reference group, which will include green and social NGO’s, unions and renewable and intensive industries.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Future Fleets Report 2024

The report paints a picture of the equipment landscape and includes detailed profiles of mines that are employing these fleets

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Digitalisation Report 2023

An in-depth review of operations that use digitalisation technology to drive improvements across all areas of mining production