MARKETS

Flagrant breaches earn miner big fines

THE US Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission has handed down more than $US900,000 in f...

Donna Schmidt
Flagrant breaches earn miner big fines

The US Mine Safety and Health Administration announced late last week that administrative law judge Avram Weisberger sided with the commission and entered a judgment with penalties totaling $905,825 to R&D Mine Coal.

Federal officials initially assessed the fines in April 2007 for violations that contributed to the October 23, 2006 explosives detonation at the company’s underground anthracite coal operation in Tremont. The incident killed one miner, Dale Reightler.

The levied penalties were the first time the agency had cited violations under the flagrant violation provision of the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 (MINER Act).

According to MSHA’s investigation report, an unconfirmed shot detonated at the face resulted in a methane explosion in an inadequately ventilated area.

The accident, which resulted in Reightler’s death, occurred because R&D failed to comply with approved ventilation and roof control plans, engaged in poor blasting practices, assigned unqualified personnel to blasting work and conducted improper preshift examinations, MSHA said.

Six of 10 violations cited in connection with the accident were assessed as flagrant violations, and the operator filed contests to all.

R&D ceased mining following the explosion and was sealed in 2007.

In documents signed August 1, R&D agreed to withdraw its contests of each violation and to the entry of a judgment for the full penalty amounts.

“We are extremely pleased about the outcome of this case,” assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health Joseph Main said.

“It is yet another reminder that mine operators must be held accountable for their failure to keep miners safe.”

MSHA defines a flagrant violation as “a reckless or repeated failure to make reasonable efforts to eliminate a known violation of a mandatory safety and health standard that substantially and proximately caused, or reasonably could have been expected to cause, death or serious bodily injury”.

Under the MINER Act, a civil penalty of up to $220,000 may be assessed for each flagrant violation.

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence: Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024

Exclusive research for Mining Magazine Intelligence Automation and Digitalisation Report 2024 shows mining companies are embracing cutting-edge tech

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Future Fleets Report 2024

The report paints a picture of the equipment landscape and includes detailed profiles of mines that are employing these fleets