MARKETS

Escarpment wins key decisions

BATHURST Resources has received a "generally favourable" High Court judgement on an appeal agains...

Staff Reporter
Escarpment wins key decisions

Australia-based Bathurst, which is also listed on the New Zealand Stock Exchange, proposed to build the coal mine in New Zealand’s Denniston Plateau in 2011 and has been at the centre of a legal battle since.

An appeal on 12 points of law was lodged by the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand on the Environment Court’s interim decision indicating it would likely grant resource consent for Bathurst’s Escarpment project.

The appeal relates to whether mitigation considerations relating to adverse effects on the environment are enough to be considered a biodiversity offset.

Forest and Bird withdrew seven points of law from the appeal, with three of the remaining five dismissed in their entirety by High Court Justice John Fogarty on Friday.

Fogarty flagged the remaining two points as minor issues that should be taken on board by the Environment Court when it decides on final approval for Escarpment on Wednesday.

Forest and Bird argued that some of the environmental work packages put forward by Bathurst were incorrectly viewed by the Environment Court as mitigating damage and the society wanted them reviewed.

Fogarty agreed and expressed the importance of the Environment Court distinguishing between “mitigation” and “offsets”

He expressed that mitigation related to the direct effects of mining activities whereas offsets related expressly to Bathurst’s proposed environmental package.

An appeal was also lodged against the preliminary decision of the Environment Court on the relevance of the adjacent Solid Energy Sullivan permit and was dismissed on Thursday.

Bathurst managing director Hamish Bohannan said the company was delighted with the decisions which brought it closer to the development of the project.

“We are pleased with the result and appreciate the guidance provided by the High Court,” Bohannan said in a statement on Friday.

“The matters raised by the High Court can be fully addressed in the Environment Court during the one-day hearing.”

But Forest and Bird believes it can still prevent the mine from being developed.

“This decision means the Environment Court will have to re-evaluate several points in our case to save Denniston from being open-cast mined,” Forest and Bird spokeswoman Debs Martin said.

“The Environment Court judge has already said that the case is ‘finely balanced’ so we’re hopeful today’s decision will cause the balance of his decision to shift in favour of protecting Denniston Plateau’s unique landscape, plants and animals.”

TOPICS:

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

A growing series of reports, each focused on a key discussion point for the mining sector, brought to you by the Mining Monthly Intelligence team.

editions

ESG Mining Company Index: Benchmarking the Future of Sustainable Mining

The ESG Mining Company Index report provides an in-depth evaluation of ESG performance of 61 of the world's largest mining companies. Using a robust framework, it assesses each company across 9 meticulously weighted indicators within 6 essential pillars.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Exploration Report 2024 (feat. Opaxe data)

A comprehensive review of exploration trends and technologies, highlighting the best intercepts and discoveries and the latest initial resource estimates.

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Future Fleets Report 2024

The report paints a picture of the equipment landscape and includes detailed profiles of mines that are employing these fleets

editions

Mining Magazine Intelligence Digitalisation Report 2023

An in-depth review of operations that use digitalisation technology to drive improvements across all areas of mining production